Designing Incentive Compatible Payment Rules for Combinatorial Auctions with Structural SVMs
نویسندگان
چکیده
Combinatorial auctions have a wide range of real-world applications; yet, designing combinatorial auction mechanisms that simultaneously possess good economic properties and computational tractability remains a major challenge. An auction mechanism consists of an allocation rule and a payment rule. We propose a new framework that uses Structural SVMs to design a payment rule for any given allocation rule. Besides being tractable, the payment rule produced by an exact classifier is both strategyproof and individually rational. Unlike the VCG payment rule, our framework does not require an optimal allocation rule, an NP-hard problem, in order to obtain a strategyproof mechanism. Our experiments show that the payment rules generated from our framework enjoy a low level of ex post regret and approximate well-known strategyproof payment rules, such as VCG and second price, reasonably well. In addition, applying our framework to an allocation rule with no corresponding strategyproof payment rule does not result in additional performance loss.
منابع مشابه
Structural SVMs for Defining Payment Rules in Combinatorial Auctions
A major challenge in combinatorial auctions is to construct payment rules to make a winner-determination algorithm maximally incentive compatible. A general purpose solution is available only when winner case for reasons of computational complexity or other economic considerations. We propose to use structural SVMs for this pricing problem. The decision boundaries for each target class (with a ...
متن کاملPayment Rules for Combinatorial Auctions via Structural Support Vector Machines
Given an optimal solution to the winner determination problem of a combinatorial auction, standard approaches provide exact incentive compatibility. Even here, significant economic concerns typically preclude these approaches. For large combinatorial auction problems, however, winner determination can only be solved approximately due to its high computational complexity, and the design of appro...
متن کاملDesigning Coalition-Proof Mechanisms for Auctions over Continuous Goods
This paper investigates reverse auctions that involve continuous values of different types of goods, general nonconvex constraints, and second stage costs. Our analysis seeks to design the payment rules and conditions under which coalitions of participants cannot influence the auction outcome in order to obtain higher collective utility. Under incentive-compatible bidding in the Vickrey-Clarke-...
متن کاملCore-Selecting Payment Rules for Combinatorial Auctions with Uncertain Availability of Goods
In some auction domains, there is uncertainty regarding the final availability of the goods being auctioned off. For example, a government may auction off spectrum from its public safety network, but it may need this spectrum back in times of emergency. In such a domain, standard combinatorial auctions perform poorly because they lead to violations of individual rationality (IR), even in expect...
متن کاملGames and Meta-Games: Pricing Rules for Combinatorial Mechanisms
In settings where full incentive-compatibility is not available, such as core-constraint combinatorial auctions and budget-balanced combinatorial exchanges, we may wish to design mechanisms that are as incentive-compatible as possible. This paper offers a new characterization of approximate incentive-compatibility by casting the pricing problem as a meta-game between the center and the particip...
متن کامل